This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

High LDL-C does not cause cardiovascular disease: Expert perspective

High LDL-C does not cause cardiovascular disease: Expert perspective

Uffe Ravnskov of  Lund, Sweden and associates assessed  recent literature of three large reviews  published by statin advocates and have put forward observational evidence that there is no  correlation between rates of atherosclerosis and either total cholesterol TC or LDL-C.The study suggests that there is inverse relationship between TC and LDL-C and heart disease inferring  that the argument that  statins reduce heart-disease risk by lowering total (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is flawed.The perspective has appeared in Journal Expert Review of Clinical Pharmacology.

For last 50 years, a high level of total cholesterol (TC) or low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) has been considered to be the major cause of atherosclerosis and cardiovascular disease (CVD), and statin treatment has been widely promoted for cardiovascular prevention.

Please also read-Statins being overprescribed for CVD prevention, finds study

Using Bradford Hill criteria for deriving causal inference from observational evidence,the researchers argue that recent literature suggesting statins reduce heart-disease risk by lowering total (TC) and LDL cholesterol (LDL-C) is flawed.

Key observations of experts are:

  1. The hypothesis that high TC or LDL-C causes atherosclerosis and CVD has been shown to be false by numerous observations and experiments.
  2. Across multiple populations, there is no  correlation between rates of atherosclerosis and either TC or LDL-C; in particular, those admitted to hospitals for acute myocardial infarction (heart attack) do not show higher TC or LDL-C levels on average than population averages.
  3. Studies that have attempted to lower TC and LDL-C over time are inconsistent at best, with some studies showing decreasing cholesterol levels to be associated with increased mortality (total and/or cardiovascular) and others showing decreased cardiovascular mortality only with very low absolute risk reductions (less than 1 percent).
  4. There is no evidence of an exposure-response relationship in the literature; i.e., greater lowering of cholesterol levels does not associate with greater lowering of risk of mortality.
  5. The majority of statin trials were completed prior to 2005, and the underlying data are unavailable for public analysis (and so have been questioned).
  6. The side effects of statins might be underestimated, particularly given the size of the prescribed population and the duration of treatment.
  7. While cardiovascular-disease (CVD) mortality has decreased substantially since statins were introduced, these decreases have not been correlated with degree of statin use and so may be primarily due to other factors.
  8. We suggest that clinicians should abandon the use of statins and PCSK-9 inhibitors and instead identify and target the actual causes of CVD.

Please also read-Statins have no role in primary prevention of CVD in elderly : BMJ

The authors concluded that “The usual argument in support of the lipid hypothesis is that numerous studies of young and middle-aged people have shown that high TC or LDL-C predict future CVD. This is correct, but association is not the same as causation.” In other words, TC or LDL-C may be effective markers for atherosclerotic risk within an untreated or minimally treated population, but this does not mean these markers are causal in the disease state.The idea that high cholesterol levels in the blood are the main cause of CVD is impossible because people with low levels become just as atherosclerotic as people with high levels and their risk of suffering from CVD is the same or higher

For further reference log on to:

Source: self

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. user
    Mrs. Neelima Patil March 7, 2019, 11:59 pm

    I am a type 2 diabetic patient with neuropathy in my legs . My doc has prescribed me stations to lower the risk of high cholesterol. Are there any chances of depriving my cholesterol which is necessary for nerves which are already deprived of mylien sheath? Are there any chances of increase in my neuropathy?

  2. user
    Dr.Deepak Kumar Sinha February 19, 2019, 12:44 pm

    ACC & AHA says cholesterol is not responsible for MI then why statin is being prescribed? Make it clear.

  3. Many of my patients having high TC n LDL for many years are still healthy with no evidence of CVD..not taking any statins. The hyperlipidemia theory in causation of atherosclerosis n CVD is misleading and false. Many young patients with acute MI come with normal or subnormal lipid profile. Even after continue aggressive use of statins in IHD patients..these suffer from ac. MI.
    probably some other theory (infective) may have role..needs further research.

  4. user
    Dr. Lakshmi Vadudevan February 18, 2019, 7:19 pm

    I have had my family members suffer serious side effects of statin. My brother had myoglobinuria and ascending spastic paralysis and my husband had station induced dermal atrophy in lower limbs. I will never advocate station to anybody