Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Uveitis treatment:...

    Uveitis treatment: Single intravitreal insert reduces recurrence provides for 3 years

    Written by Medha Baranwal Baranwal Published On 2019-08-05T19:25:23+05:30  |  Updated On 5 Aug 2019 7:25 PM IST
    Uveitis treatment: Single intravitreal insert reduces recurrence provides for 3 years



    Delhi: A single intravitreal injection of the fluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insert (FAi) reduced the recurrence of non-infectious posterior segment uveitis for 3 years, according to a recent study.


    The study, presented at the 2019 American Society of Retina Specialists Annual Meeting in Chicago, IL, found that in patients with non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye, treatment with a single intravitreal injection of the FAi provided anti-inflammatory treatment for 3 years.


    Noninfectious Uveitis is a serious, sight-threatening intraocular inflammatory condition characterized by inflammation of the uvea, the pigmented layer that lies between the inner retina and the outer fibrous layer composed of the sclera and cornea.


    Quan Dong Nguyen, professor of ophthalmology at Stanford University Medical Center, and colleagues determined the 36-month safety and efficacy of a single failure for treatment of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye.


    Also Read: Vitamin D may prevent relapse of Uveitis, finds study

    For the purpose, the researchers conducted a controlled, prospective, double-masked trial. The trial enrolled 129 patients from across 33 sites in the US, Europe, Israel, and India. A 2:1 block randomization based on therapy, to receive FAi (87) or sham injection (42).


    To be included, patients needed to have experienced at least 2 separate recurrences of non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye requiring 3 or more months of systemic therapy or 2 or more intraocular or periocular steroid injections and with a history of the disease lasting 1 year or longer. The primary efficacy endpoint of the study was non-infectious uveitis affecting the posterior segment of the eye occurrence.


    Investigators noted multiple secondary efficacy endpoints within their study. Secondary endpoints included visual acuity and macular thickness/edema. The safety endpoints were rates of adverse events, including the incidence of cataract and elevated intraocular pressure.


    Also Read: Yutiq now available for Chronic posterior segment Uveitis

    Key findings:

    • The overall rate of recurrence during the study period in FAi treated eyes (56.3%) was significantly lower than the rate in eyes randomized to sham injection (92.9%).

    • Visual acuity improvements of 3 or more lines were more common among the FAi treatment group (33% versus 15%).

    • Visual acuity loss was more common among patients in the sham group (9% versus 1% sham) at the final study visit.

    • In eyes with baseline macular edema, 34 of 40 (85%) patients achieved resolution at month 36 when treated with FAi compared to 16 of 23 (70%) patients in the sham group.

    • In regard to safety, 42% of FAi and 33% of sham patients required IOP lowering medications. Investigators also noted that 6% of patients in the FAi group and 12% of patients in the sham group required IOP lowering surgery.

    • Cataract surgery was performed on 74% of phakic study eyes in the FAi group and on 24% of phakic eyes in the sham group.









    EyeFAIfluocinolone acetonide intravitreal insertinflammationintraocular pressureintravitreal injectionIOPMedical newsnon-infectiousphakic eyesPosterior SegmentQuan Dong Nguyenrecent medical newsrecurrencetreatmentuveitisvisual acuity

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok