- Home
- Editorial
- News
- Practice Guidelines
- Anesthesiology Guidelines
- Cancer Guidelines
- Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
- Critical Care Guidelines
- Dentistry Guidelines
- Dermatology Guidelines
- Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
- Diagnostics Guidelines
- ENT Guidelines
- Featured Practice Guidelines
- Gastroenterology Guidelines
- Geriatrics Guidelines
- Medicine Guidelines
- Nephrology Guidelines
- Neurosciences Guidelines
- Obs and Gynae Guidelines
- Ophthalmology Guidelines
- Orthopaedics Guidelines
- Paediatrics Guidelines
- Psychiatry Guidelines
- Pulmonology Guidelines
- Radiology Guidelines
- Surgery Guidelines
- Urology Guidelines
Two antiplatelet drugs may prevent further strokes but increase major bleeds
People experiencing a minor stroke or a transient ischaemic attack have a lower risk of further stroke within 90 days if given clopidogrel and aspirin, rather than aspirin alone. However, taking both drugs doubles the risk of bleeding over the same period.
Current UK guidelines recommend using clopidogrel alone.
In this major international trial of nearly 5,000 people, those who took the dual treatment had fewer heart attacks or strokes than those who took aspirin only, particularly in the first 30 days of treatment. Major bleeding risk was fairly constant on combined treatment throughout 90 days, occurring in 0.9% compared with 0.4% on aspirin.
This study provides more evidence on the balance of benefits and risks. Further research into the timing and duration of dual antiplatelet therapy is needed.
Why was this study needed?
About 136,000 people in England have a first or recurrent ischaemic stroke (due to a clot) each year. Another 20,000 people have a transient ischaemic attack (TIA) – where a small clot causes a temporary lack of blood supply to an area of the brain, but the neurological symptoms fully resolve within 24 hours. The risk of having a recurrent ischaemic stroke or stroke within 90 days of a TIA is up to 17%.
Antiplatelet treatment such as aspirin reduces the formation of blood clots, and so lowers the chance of a further ischaemic stroke by around 20%.
A previous large trial in China (CHANCE) found that dual therapy with clopidogrel and aspirin for 21 days was more effective than aspirin alone. They did not find an increased bleeding risk, but the trial differed in ethnic mix from the UK.
This study helps build further evidence on safety and effectiveness of dual antiplatelet therapy.
What did this study do?
The POINT randomised trial recruited 4,881 adults (83% in the US) from 269 international sites. Participants were randomly allocated to either dual therapy, or aspirin alone within 12 hours of having a mild ischaemic stroke, or a high-risk TIA.
Dual therapy involved 600mg clopidogrel on day 1, then 75mg/day on days 2 to 90, and aspirin ranging from 50mg to 325mg/day (depending on usual dosage in the trial country). The comparison group took a placeboresembling clopidogrel plus aspirin doses in the same range as the dual therapy group.
The trial was well conducted, but it was underpowered because it was halted before the planned number of participants had been treated. This was due to early findings that the combination caused more bleeding.
What did it find?
- People taking clopidogrel with aspirin had lower rates of ischaemic events (a combined outcome of ischaemic stroke, heart attack, or death due to blood clots) than those on aspirin alone (hazard ratio [HR] 0.75, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.59 to 0.95). Absolute numbers of ischaemic events were 121/2,432 (5%) in the dual therapy group and 160/2,449 (6.5%) in the aspirin only group.
- Taking dual therapy after a minor stroke reduced the risk of ischaemic events compared with aspirin (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.95) but there was an uncertain benefit after TIA (HR 0.85, 95% CI 0.57 to 1.28).
- Ischaemic strokes were less common in people on dual therapy (HR 0.72, 95% CI 0.56 to 0.92), as was the combined outcome of all strokes due to clots or bleeding (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.58 to 0.94).
- People on dual therapy had a higher risk of major bleeding than those on aspirin alone (HR 2.32, 95% CI 1.10 to 4.87). Absolute numbers of major bleeding events were 23/2,432 (0.9%) in the dual therapy group and 10/2,449 (0.4%) in the aspirin only group.
- For 1,000 people treated with clopidogrel and aspirin for 90 days, an estimated 15 adverse events due to clotting would be prevented, and an estimated five people would have major bleeding.
What does current guidance say on this issue?
The Royal College of Physicians’ 2016 national stroke guideline recommends clopidogrel alone to prevent recurrence for people who have had an ischaemic stroke or TIA. If this cannot be taken or tolerated, they recommend modified-release dipyridamole in combination with aspirin. This guideline recognises that clopidogrel is not licensed for use in people following TIA.
Current NICE guidelines on diagnosis and initial management of stroke and TIA recommend aspirin or clopidogrel. They do not provide recommendations on the use of aspirin and clopidogrel dual therapy.
The NICE guidelines include a research recommendation, calling for studies which examine whether modified-release dipyridamole or clopidogrel with aspirin improves outcomes compared with aspirin alone when administered early after acute ischaemic stroke.
What are the implications?
For people who have had a mild stroke or a high-risk TIA this evidence shows that although dual therapy reduces the risk of further ischaemic events, this is at the expense of increasing the risk of major bleeding.
Given the difference in bleeding rates between this and the CHANCE study, future research may be needed into the dosage and duration of dual therapy to maximise benefits and reduce potential harms. The position remains unclear for people following a moderate or severe stroke or those who are eligible to have the clot dissolved or removed as they were excluded from the study.
The article first appeared in NIHR Signal
For reference log on to: doi: 10.3310/signal-000649
Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd