- Home
- Editorial
- News
- Practice Guidelines
- Anesthesiology Guidelines
- Cancer Guidelines
- Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
- Critical Care Guidelines
- Dentistry Guidelines
- Dermatology Guidelines
- Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
- Diagnostics Guidelines
- ENT Guidelines
- Featured Practice Guidelines
- Gastroenterology Guidelines
- Geriatrics Guidelines
- Medicine Guidelines
- Nephrology Guidelines
- Neurosciences Guidelines
- Obs and Gynae Guidelines
- Ophthalmology Guidelines
- Orthopaedics Guidelines
- Paediatrics Guidelines
- Psychiatry Guidelines
- Pulmonology Guidelines
- Radiology Guidelines
- Surgery Guidelines
- Urology Guidelines
Study outlines ways to cut-down number of knee MRI scans
Overuse of medical imaging increases the cost of healthcare and also poses a risk for the patients. A recent study published in the Journal of American College of Radiology has suggested a few ways which may cut down the number of Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) scans for knee injuries.
According to the study, a standardized reporting template, a grading system to determine injury severity, and clinician education are three elements which are needed to achieve the same.
The researches from UT Southwestern Medical Center in Dallas randomly selected a consecutive series of 292 knee Magnetic Resonance Imaging scans from a pool of 882 studies (33%) performed during the first 6 months of 2017.
The reports from these studies were evaluated by a musculoskeletal (MSK) imaging fellow to determine whether there were severe degenerative changes, defined as high-grade or full thickness cartilage loss on both sides of the joint over an area of at least 1 cm or more.
Twenty per cent of these studies were also reviewed by an MSK fellowship-trained radiology attending physician for quality control purposes.
A second musculoskeletal radiologist, blinded to the Magnetic Resonance Imaging (MRI) results, evaluated corresponding knee x-rays, which were taken within six months of the MRI.
By August 2017, the facility implemented the five-point Kellgren-Lawrence (KL) grading scale to rate the degree of osteoarthritis. Grade 0 indicates no evidence of osteoarthritis on x-rays, while grade 4 indicates severe sclerosis and bone deformity.
With KL grades 3 or 4 on x-ray, clinicians typically do not recommend a follow-up Magnetic Resonance Imaging(MRI) to confirm results, as the diagnosis seems clear.
The second reader inserted the KL grade 3 or 4 scores from the knee x-rays into newly adopted structured reporting templates with recommendations for follow-up.
The facility then held monthly educational meetings for its musculoskeletal staff for presentations on how the KL grading system worked and how physicians could save hospital resources by avoiding follow-up MRI scans when x-rays showed osteoarthritis at KL grades 3 and 4.
The initiative succeeded. Prior to the program's start, 55% of MRI scans performed were on patients with KL scores of 3 or 4. After the improvement program was implemented, from October 2017 to February 2018, the frequency of knee MRI scans decreased significantly to 30% (p < .001). In addition, 80% of knee MRI scans corresponded with x-ray KL scores, which further reinforced the lack of need for follow-up MRI.
The authors concluded that the implementation of a standardized reporting template for knee x-rays with auto-populated KL grading focused clinician education are effective ways to decrease the repeated knee MRI scans.
Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd