Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Editors Pick
    • Routine third...

    Routine third trimester ultrasound in low-risk pregnancies has no benefit, finds BMJ study

    Written by Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli Published On 2019-10-24T20:10:17+05:30  |  Updated On 24 Oct 2019 8:10 PM IST
    Routine third trimester ultrasound in low-risk pregnancies has no benefit, finds BMJ study

    Netherlands-Fetal growth restriction is a risk factor for perinatal mortality and morbidity and cardiovascular disease and neurodevelopmental disorders in adulthood. Therefore routine ultrasonography in the third trimester detects neonates who are small for gestational age (SGA) significantly more often than usual care using serial fundal height measurements combined with clinically indicated ultrasonography. Many professionals like ultrasound and seem to believe that a universal screening strategy must be superior to a selective strategy to achieve good neonatal and long-term health outcomes but the evidence that routine ultrasonography in the third trimester reduces the incidence of severe adverse perinatal outcomes is lacking.


    A new study has found that in low-risk pregnancies, routine ultrasonography in the third trimester combined with clinically indicated ultrasonography was associated with greater antenatal detection of small-for-gestational-age neonates and induction of labour but was not associated with a reduction in severe adverse perinatal outcomes compared with usual care.




    The researchers conducted a pragmatic, multicentre, stepped wedge cluster randomised trial to investigate the effectiveness of routine ultrasonography in the third trimester in reducing adverse perinatal outcomes in low-risk pregnancies compared with usual care and the effect of this policy on maternal outcomes and obstetric interventions.



    The study involved 13 046 women aged 16 years or older with a low-risk singleton pregnancy and in the study 60 midwifery practices offered usual care (serial fundal height measurements with clinically indicated ultrasonography). After 3, 7, and 10 months, a third of the practices were randomised to the intervention strategy. As well as receiving usual care, women in the intervention strategy were offered two routine biometry scans at 28-30 and 34-36 weeks’ gestation. The same multidisciplinary protocol for detecting and managing fetal growth restriction was used in both strategies.




    The primary outcome measure was a composite of severe adverse perinatal outcomes: perinatal death, Apgar score <4, impaired consciousness, asphyxia, seizures, assisted ventilation, septicaemia, meningitis, bronchopulmonary dysplasia, intraventricular haemorrhage, periventricular leucomalacia, or necrotising enterocolitis. Secondary outcomes were two composite measures of severe maternal morbidity, and spontaneous labour and birth.




    The researchers organised enrollment of 13 520 women in mid-pregnancy between 1 February 2015 and 29 February 2016 by 60 midwifery practices. 13 046 women with data based on the national Dutch perinatal registry or hospital records were included in the analyses. Small for gestational age at birth was significantly more often detected in the intervention group than in the usual care group. The incidence of severe adverse perinatal outcomes was 1.7% for the intervention strategy and 1.8% for usual care. After adjustment for confounders, the difference between the groups was not significant. The intervention strategy showed a higher incidence of induction of labour and a lower incidence of augmentation of labour. Maternal outcomes and other obstetric interventions did not differ between the strategies.




    The researchers concluded that in low-risk pregnancies, routine ultrasonography in the third trimester along with clinically indicated ultrasonography was associated with higher antenatal detection of small for gestational age fetuses but not with a reduced incidence of severe adverse perinatal outcomes compared with usual care alone. Based on these findings, routine ultrasonography has no benefit (or harm) to the neonate but was associated with a moderately increased incidence of induction of labour.The findings do not support routine ultrasonography in the third trimester for low-risk pregnancies.

    For further reference log on to :

    https://doi.org/10.1136/bmj.l5517



    Trial registration Netherlands Trial Register NTR4367.



    adverse perinatal outcomesfetal growth restrictionroutinethird trimesterUltrasonographyUltrasound
    Source : BMJ

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli
    Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok