Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • News
    • Cardiac Sciences
    • Risky to attempt SAVR...

    Risky to attempt SAVR within 3 months of a stroke : Study

    Written by Medha Baranwal Baranwal Published On 2018-05-02T20:25:42+05:30  |  Updated On 2 May 2018 8:25 PM IST
    Risky to attempt SAVR within 3 months of a stroke : Study

    The previous stroke is a major risk factor for recurrent ischemic stroke and major adverse cardiac event (MACE) in patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement (SAVR), especially if the time elapsed between previous stroke and surgery is less than 3 months, suggests a study published in the journal JAMA Cardiology.


    The study was conducted by Charlotte Andreasen, Copenhagen University Hospital, Hellerup, Denmark, and colleagues, with an objective to evaluate the association of time elapsed between previous stroke and SAVR with the risk of recurrent perioperative stroke, MACE, and mortality among patients with aortic valve stenosis.


    SAVR is a surgery done for replacement of an aortic valve in conditions of aortic valve stenosis and aortic valve regurgitation. During this surgery, the damaged valve is removed and replaced with an artificial valve. The valve replacement is typically an open-heart surgery.


    Progression of aortic valve stenosis is medically unpreventable. Likewise, the mortality rate among severely symptomatic patients is markedly increased unless aortic valve replacement is performed. Ischemic stroke is a feared complication of SAVR and prior stroke is a well-established risk factor for periprocedural stroke. Recurrent stroke is associated with more severe functional disability, greater financial burden, and increased mortality compared with an incident stroke. Consequently, it is of particular relevance to investigate the association of time elapsed between previous stroke and SAVR with the risk of adverse outcomes in patients with aortic valve stenosis.


    For carrying out the cohort study, the researchers used data from Danish administrative registries and included all patients with aortic valve stenosis older than 18 years who underwent SAVR between 1996 and 2014 (n = 14 030). Patients who received simultaneous mitral, tricuspid, or pulmonary valve surgery and patients with endocarditis 1 year prior to surgery were excluded.


    Based on the study, the researchers found out that the rate of SAVR-related ischemic stroke was about 18% in that early period after a prior stroke, compared with 1.2% for patients without prior stroke. This corresponded to a 14-fold jump in adjusted risk. That compared to only a 2-fold to 4-fold risk increase for SAVR performed later than 3 months after a stroke, reported investigators in Denmark based on their nationwide 14,000-patient cohort study. The risk for major adverse cardiac events (MACE: acute MI, ischemic stroke, or cardiovascular death) related to SAVR, meaning within 30 days of the procedure, followed a similar time pattern.



    But prior stroke showed no associations with death from any cause or cardiovascular causes within 30 days of SAVR.

    "Therefore, the data suggest that the increased risk of MACE was mainly driven by the increased risk of stroke," Dr. Andreasen told theheart.org | Medscape Cardiology.


    The findings suggest that any SAVR that is needed after a stroke be delayed for at least 3 or 4 months if possible, to reduce the risk of recurrent stroke.


    Delaying it longer could potentially lower the risk even further, but importantly, "the mortality rate among severely symptomatic patients is known to be markedly increased unless aortic valve replacement is performed, and for critically ill patients, postponement may not be an option," said Andreasen.


    For further information click on the link: 10.1001/jamacardio.2018.0899


    Charlotte Andreasencohort studyDr. Charlotte AndreasenIschemic strokesJAMA Cardiologyjournal JAMA CardiologyMACEmajor adverse cardiac eventperioperative strokerisk factors for strokeSAVRSAVR-related ischemic strokesurgical aortic valve replacement
    Source : With inputs from JAMA Cardiology

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok