This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

Placing wet gauze on babies tummies speeds up urine collection

Placing wet gauze on babies tummies speeds up urine collection

Urinary tract infections (UTIs) are common in young children, affecting 5-7% of febrile children under 2 years of age. Expedient collection of a urine sample allows for dipstick urinalysis and microscopy screening to guide immediate clinical decision making for treatment initiation.NICE guidelines recommend non-invasive ‘clean catch’ collection if possible but this can be difficult, especially in young children. They estimate that 20 minutes of staff time can be needed to obtain a sample. 

In a  Randomised controlled trial researchers have tried to determine if a simple stimulation method increases the rate of infant voiding for clean catch urine within five minutes. In a study conducted in the Emergency Department of a tertiary pediatric hospital, Australia Jonathan Kaufman and associates tried to collect a urine sample in 354 infants (aged 1-12 months). 

Infants were randomised to either gentle suprapubic cutaneous stimulation (n=174) using gauze soaked in cold fluid (the Quick-Wee method) or standard clean catch urine with no additional stimulation (n=170), for five minutes by the researchers. The primary outcome was voiding of urine within five minutes. Secondary outcomes were a successful collection of a urine sample, contamination rate, and parental and clinician satisfaction with the method.

It was found that  Quick-Wee method resulted in a significantly higher rate of voiding within five minutes compared with standard clean catch urine (31% v 12%, P<0.001), the difference in proportions 19% favoring Quick-Wee (95% confidence interval for difference 11% to 28%). Quick-Wee had a higher rate of successful urine sample collection (30% v 9%, P<0.001) and greater parental and clinician satisfaction (median 2 v 3 on a 5 point Likert scale, P<0.001). The difference in contamination between Quick-Wee and standard clean catch urine was not significant (27% v 45%, P=0.29). The number needed to treat was 4.7 (95% confidence interval 3.4 to 7.7) to successfully collect one additional urine sample within five minutes using Quick-Wee compared with standard clean catch urine.

It was concluded that Quick-Wee is a simple cutaneous stimulation method that significantly increases the five-minute voiding and success rate of clean catch urine collection.

For more details click on the link :

BMJ 2017357 doi:

Source: self

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted