Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Fracture risk higher...

    Fracture risk higher with warfarin compared to DOACs: JAMA

    Written by Medha Baranwal Baranwal Published On 2019-11-29T19:25:07+05:30  |  Updated On 29 Nov 2019 7:25 PM IST
    Fracture risk higher with warfarin compared to DOACs: JAMA

    USA: In patients with atrial fibrillation (AF), the use of warfarin compared with newer direct oral anticoagulants (DOACs) increases the risk of fractures, finds a recent study published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine. These findings suggest that caution should be used when prescribing warfarin to patients with AF at high risk of fracture and DOACs -- particularly apixaban -- should be preferred for AF patients at increased risk of fractures.


    Warfarin, an anticoagulant, is used for the prevention of cardioembolic complications in patients with atrial fibrillation. Whether warfarin use is associated with adverse effects on bone health is controversial. The availability of alternate DOAC options now makes it possible to evaluate the comparative safety of warfarin in association with fracture risk.


    Pamela L. Lutsey, University of Minnesota School of Public Health, Minneapolis, and colleagues determined whether the use of DOACs (dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban) versus warfarin is associated with a lower risk of incident fracture in patients with nonvalvular AF.


    For the purpose, the researchers conducted a comparative effectiveness cohort study of patients with nonvalvular AF prescribed oral anticoagulants from January 1, 2010, through September 30, 2015, using the MarketSan claims database. A total, 167, 275 patients were included in the study—the mean age of the cohort was 68.9 (12.5) years and 62% were men.


    DOACs included in the study were dabigatran etexilate, rivaroxaban, and apixaban. Of the treatments compared in the study, 10.6% received apixaban, 18.9% received dabigatran etexilate, 21.% received rivaroxaban, and 49.4% received warfarin.


    The main outcome measures of the study were an incident hip fracture, fractures requiring hospitalizations, and all clinical fractures, which investigators identified through the use of inpatient and outpatient claims. In an effort to reduce confounding, investigators matched patients based on sex, age, CHA2DS2-VASc score, and high-dimensional propensity scores.


    Read Also: Use of Aspirin with warfarin increases bleeding risk significantly: JAMA


    Key findings of the study include:




    • A total of 817 hip fractures, 2013 hospitalized fractures, and 7294 total fractures occurred during a mean (SD) follow-up of 16.9 (13.7) months.

    • In multivariable-adjusted, propensity score-matched Cox proportional hazards regression models, relative to new users of warfarin, new users of DOACs tended to be at lower risk of fractures requiring hospitalization (hazard ratio [HR], 0.87) and all clinical fractures (HR, 0.93), whereas the association with hip fractures (HR, 0.91) was not statistically significant.

    • When comparing individual DOACs with warfarin, the strongest findings were for apixaban (HR for hip fracture, 0.67; HR for fractures requiring hospitalization, 0.60; and HR for all clinical fractures, 0.86).

    • In subgroup analyses, DOACs appeared more beneficial among patients with AF who also had a diagnosis of osteoporosis than among those without a diagnosis of osteoporosis.


    Read Also: Edoxaban more beneficial than Warfarin in patients with atrial fibrillation

    "In 167 275 AF patients, the use of DOACs -- particularly apixaban -- versus warfarin was associated with a lower risk of fractures. These associations are more pronounced in patients with a diagnosis of osteoporosis," wrote the authors.


    This study, titled “Association of Anticoagulant Therapy With Risk of Fracture Among Patients With Atrial Fibrillation,” is published in the journal JAMA Internal Medicine.


    DOI: https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2019.5679

    apixabanatrial fibrillationdabigatran etexilatedirect oral anticoagulantsfractureJAMA Internal MedicinePamela L. LutseyRivaroxabanwarfarin
    Source : JAMA Internal Medicine

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok