Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Case of the day
    • Metal split piece...

    Metal split piece causes penetrating injury that mimics gun shot injury: Case Report

    Written by Deepanjana Sarkar Published On 2019-08-26T18:00:37+05:30  |  Updated On 26 Aug 2019 6:00 PM IST
    Metal split piece causes penetrating injury that mimics gun shot injury: Case Report

    A metal split piece penetrated the left supraclavicular region of 27 year's old Arabic man mimicking a gun bullet, according to a case study published in the Journal of Medical Case Reports. What is surprising about this case is that the man was fully conscious, oriented, and hemodynamically stable after the accident.


    According to the case study, the man was presented to the emergency department of Isola d’Elba Hospital 1 hour after an occupational hazard occurred while he was making firewood with an axe for the wood oven of his restaurant. He stated that a metal sliver, coming from the axe using for wood chopping, penetrated his neck in the left supraclavicular region. On admission, he was fully conscious, oriented, and hemodynamically stable. He did not refer to a significant past medical history.


    His vital parameters were normal: his pulse rate was 70 beats per minute (bpm), his blood pressure was 140/80 mmHg, peripheral blood oxygenation was 95% without oxygen therapy, and the corporeal temperature was 36.3 °C. He also did not demonstrate any clinical symptoms such as chest pain or dyspnea: respiratory excursions were full and symmetrical, lungs resonant to percussion, and vesicular breath sound was reduced in left basal field; no rales, rhonchi, wheezes, or rubs were present; vocal and tactile fremitus was reduced in the same field. The results of a cardiovascular examination were: no abnormal heaves or lifts; no trill; regular rate and rhythm; no extra sounds or murmurs. At the level of his abdomen: no abnormal tympany was detected, with normal bowel sounds; superficial and deep palpation did not reveal any organomegaly or masses; no evidence of direct or rebound tenderness, rigidity, or guarding; liver and spleen appeared to be of normal size. At a neurological examination, he was alert and attentive.


    His speech was clear and fluent with a good repetition, comprehension, and naming. There was no pronator drift of outstretched arms. His muscle bulk and tone were normal. Strength was full bilaterally. His reflexes were 2+ and symmetric at the biceps, triceps, knees, and ankles. Plantar responses were flexor. Light touch, pinprick, position sense, and vibration sense were intact in fingers and toes. Rapid alternating movements and fine finger movements were intact. There was no dysmetria on finger-to-nose and heel-knee-shin. There were no abnormal or extraneous movements. Romberg sign was absent.


    On the basis of the collected anamnestic data, he underwent computed tomography (CT) scan that showed left hemopneumothorax, pneumomediastinum, and subcutaneous emphysema, without any signs of active bleeding. Another important radiological finding was the evidence of a metal foreign body in the left side of his chest cavity above the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm. No cervical structural injuries were detected upon radiological examination. A tube was placed in the left side of his chest with drainage of approximately 1000 mL of blood. He was then transferred by helicopter to our department in the Siena Hospital, tertiary trauma center, for the surgical removal of the foreign body. He was immediately brought to the operating room where he was intubated with a double-lumen endotracheal tube. Biportal video-assisted thoracic surgery (VATS) was performed: a 10 mm camera port was placed on the IX intercostal space, midaxillary line, and a 5 mm working port was made on the V intercostal space on the site of the chest tube, which was previously inserted.




    Journal of Medical Case Reports Chest computed tomography scan: evidence of a metal foreign body in the left chest cavity above the ipsilateral hemidiaphragm (the arrow indicates the metal foreign body)

    Journal of Medical Case Reports Lung injury: exit wound in the dorsal segment of the left upper lobe (the arrow indicates the exit wound)

    Journal of Medical Case Reports Lung injury: entrance hole at the left pleural dome (the arrow indicates the entrance hole)

    Journal of Medical Case Reports Foreign body: 1.5 cm pointed, sharp metal sliver

    Left-sided VATS showed persistent hemothorax (600 mL) with blood clots that were removed. During the chest cavity inspection, the doctors found the foreign body, visible on the CT scan, in the left costodiaphragmatic angle. It consisted of a 1.5 cm pointed, sharp metal sliver, entering his supraclavicular region.


    The authors concluded that the sliver narrowly missed the subclavian vessels, mimicking a gun bullet. In fact, while exploring his chest cavity, th authors noticed the entrance hole at the left pleural dome where the sliver had just penetrated the apex of the lung passing through the upper lobe of his left lung creating an exit wound in the dorsal segment of the same lobe.


    "In the literature, there are several case series about this topic, with some of them reporting unusual foreign bodies that lead to penetrating trauma. However, to the best of our knowledge, no cases like the one we have reported are described in the current literature." concluded the authors.


    For reference, click on the link

    Journal of Medical Case Reports

    blood pressureCASEcase reportcase studyComputed tomographydysmetriaemergency departmentgun bulletIsola d’Elba Hospitalleft supraclavicularMedical newsmedical news indiaMetal sliver penetrates man's left supraclavicularoxygen therapyperipheral bloodpulse raterespiratory excursionsupraclavicular region

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Deepanjana Sarkar
    Deepanjana Sarkar
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok