This site is intended for Healthcare professionals only.

Is fasting before Lipid Profile necessary?


Is fasting before Lipid Profile necessary?

Fasting for eight to 12 hours before having blood drawn for a Lipid Profile Test was thought to give a more accurate assessment of total cholesterol, LDL cholesterol, HDL cholesterol, and triglycerides. One problem with fasting is that we spend most of the day in the nonfasting state, so the way cholesterol tests are currently done doesn’t necessarily give a clear picture of “normal” levels. Salient points are

In a pooled analysis of 20 studies comprising 103,353 subjects who didn’t fast and 48 studies with a combined 199,076 subjects who did. In those studies, the ability to predic using nonfasting lipid tests was 31 percent greater (hazard ratio 1.72 vs. 1.41) than in fasting lipid tests.

  • As a matter of fact fasting for >8 h, as previously required for lipid profiles, normally only occurs a few hours before breakfast and by contrast, the nonfasting state predominates most of a 24-h cycle and better captures atherogenic lipoprotein levels.
  • Plasma contains atherogenic lipoproteins of hepatic origin in the fasting state and additionally those of intestinal origin in the nonfasting state.
  • Maximal mean changes for random, nonfasting versus fasting levels are +26 mg/dl for triglycerides, −8 mg/dl for total cholesterol, −8 mg/dl for low-density lipoprotein cholesterol, +8 mg/dl for remnant cholesterol, and −8 mg/dl for non–high-density lipoprotein cholesterol;
  • lipoprotein(a), apolipoprotein B, and high-density lipoprotein cholesterol are largely unaffected.

Fasting is a hassle for everyone concerned — patients, clinicians, and even lab workers therefore For patients, laboratories, and clinicians alike, nonfasting lipid profiles represent a simplification without negative implications for prognostic, diagnostic, and therapeutic options for cardiovascular disease prevention. Keeping this in view several societies’ guidelines and statements in Denmark, the United Kingdom, Europe, Canada, Brazil, and the United States endorse nonfasting lipid profiles.

Nonfasting cholesterol testing is more accurate lipid profile for individual patients switching to it shall be path of least resistance for patients and clinicians.

For more details click on the link :

http://www.onlinejacc.org/content/70/13/1637?utm_source=LinksMedicus+Newsletter&utm_campaign=064d5609b2-

The following two tabs change content below.
Anjali Nimesh

Anjali Nimesh

Anjali Nimesh Joined Medical Dialogue as Reporter in 2016. she covers all the medical specialty news in different medical categories. She also covers the Medical guidelines, Medical Journals, rare medical surgeries as well as all the updates in medical filed. She is a graduate from Dr. Bhimrao Ambedkar University. She can be contacted at editorial@medicaldialogues.in Contact no. 011-43720751
Source: self

Share your Opinion Disclaimer

Sort by: Newest | Oldest | Most Voted
  1. why not advocate for both fasting and non fasting lipid levels and come to a conclusion !!!
    Either the Reagent manufacturers or the Pharma companies will gain or loose !!!

  2. user
    Deo Nidhi Mishra October 6, 2017, 4:46 pm

    Random testing of lipid profile is convenient & gives accurate atherogenic profile of the patient

  3. Thats because non fasting will be higher than fasting
    This will convert may be 5% of patients across the line
    Out of a population of say 10 million guess how much business that means for the statin industry

  4. When limits of FBS and ppbs were reduced millions turned out to be diabetics over night.But strict control may be good.