- Home
- Editorial
- News
- Practice Guidelines
- Anesthesiology Guidelines
- Cancer Guidelines
- Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
- Critical Care Guidelines
- Dentistry Guidelines
- Dermatology Guidelines
- Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
- Diagnostics Guidelines
- ENT Guidelines
- Featured Practice Guidelines
- Gastroenterology Guidelines
- Geriatrics Guidelines
- Medicine Guidelines
- Nephrology Guidelines
- Neurosciences Guidelines
- Obs and Gynae Guidelines
- Ophthalmology Guidelines
- Orthopaedics Guidelines
- Paediatrics Guidelines
- Psychiatry Guidelines
- Pulmonology Guidelines
- Radiology Guidelines
- Surgery Guidelines
- Urology Guidelines
Gabapentinoids not found suitable for treating long-term low back pain
In a Meta-analysis of eight published trials in unselected patients, Dr. Harsha Shanthanna and associates evaluated the role of gabapentinoids in adults with long-term lower back pain. The researchers have confirmed that gabapentinoids offer little benefit, either alone or in combination with other analgesics. In addition to this, they provide a high rate of adverse effects and therefore their use in unselected long-term low back pain is currently not supported.These findings support NICE guidance not to use these drugs to treat long-term lower back pain.
Chronic Low Back Pain (CLBP) is very common, with a lifetime prevalence between 51% and 80%. In the majority, it is nonspecific in nature and multifactorial in etiology. Pregabalin (PG) and Gabapentin (GB) are gabapentinoids that have demonstrated benefit in neuropathic pain conditions. Despite no clear rationale, they are increasingly used for nonspecific CLBP.
The researchers searched Electronic databases of MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane from their inception until December 20th, 2016. Randomized control trials reporting the use of gabapentinoids for the treatment of CLBP of >3 months duration, in adult patients were included. Study selection and data extraction were performed independently by paired reviewers. Outcomes were guided by Initiative on Methods, Measurement and Pain Assessment in Clinical Trials guidelines, with pain relief and safety as the primary outcomes
They found that
- Gabapentin provided a non-significant improvement in pain compared to placebo. The standardized mean difference (SMD) was 0.22 units (95% confidence interval [CI] -0.5 to +0.07) on a patient-reported scale of 0 to 10, where lower numbers indicate less pain (three studies, 185 participants).
- Pregabalin was less effective at reducing pain than the other medications. The SMD was 0.42, which is a moderate effect in favour of the other drugs (95% CI 0.20 to 0.64). This was from a Meta-analysis of three studies (332 participants), one of which compared pregabalin with an antidepressant class drug (amitriptyline), one a type of anti-inflammatory (celecoxib) and one paracetamol combined with an opioid (Tramacet).
- Adverse events were more common with gabapentin and included dizziness, fatigue, difficulty thinking, and visual disturbances.
It was concluded that while GB showed minimal improvement of pain compared to placebo, pain relief with PG was inferior compared to the active analgesic group. GB and PG were both associated with increased risk of dizziness compared with placebo or the active comparator, respectively. GB was additionally associated with increased risk of fatigue, visual disturbances, and difficulties with mentation compared with placebo.
For more details click on the link: https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pmed.1002369
Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd