Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Practice Guidelines
    • Featured Practice Guidelines
    • ESO/ESMINT Guidelines...

    ESO/ESMINT Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    Written by Hina Zahid Published On 2019-06-19T19:00:39+05:30  |  Updated On 19 Jun 2019 7:00 PM IST
    ESO/ESMINT Guidelines on Mechanical Thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke

    European Stroke Organisation (ESO)along with European Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological Therapy (ESMINT) has released guidelines on Mechanical thrombectomy in Acute Ischemic Stroke. The guidelines have been developed to assist physicians in their clinical decisions with regard to Mechanical thrombectomy MT.


    Mechanical thrombectomy (MT) has become the cornerstone of acute ischemic stroke management in patients with large vessel occlusion (LVO). Appropriate patient selection and timely reperfusion are crucial. Further randomized trials are needed to inform clinical decision-making with regard to the mothership and drip-and-ship approaches, anaesthesia modalities during MT, and to determine whether MT is beneficial in patients with low stroke severity or large infarct volume.



    Main Recommendations



    • In adults with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke presenting within 6 hours after symptom onset, we recommend mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management—including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated—over best medical management alone to improve functional outcome.

    • In adults with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke presenting between 6 and 24 hours from time last known well and fulfilling the selection criteria of DEFUSE-3* or DAWN**, we recommend mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management over best medical management alone to improve functional outcome.

    • In patients with large vessel occlusion-related ischemic stroke eligible for both treatments, we recommend intravenous thrombolysis plus mechanical thrombectomy over mechanical thrombectomy alone. Both treatments should be performed as early as possible after hospital arrival. Mechanical thrombectomy should not prevent the initiation of intravenous thrombolysis, and intravenous thrombolysis should not delay mechanical thrombectomy.

    • In patients with large vessel occlusion-related ischemic stroke not eligible for intravenous thrombolysis, we recommend mechanical thrombectomy as a stand-alone treatment.

    • In patients with suspected stroke, we cannot make a recommendation on the use of a prehospital scale for improving identification of patients eligible for mechanical thrombectomy. We suggest enrolling patients in a dedicated randomized controlled trial, whenever possible.

    • We cannot make recommendations on whether for adults identified as potential candidates for mechanical thrombectomy in the prehospital field, the mothership or the drip-and-ship model should be applied to improve functional outcome.

    • We recommend that patients aged ≥80 years with large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke within 6 hours of symptom onset should be treated with mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated. Application of an upper age limit for mechanical thrombectomy is not justified.

    • We suggest that patients aged ≥80 years with large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke between 6 and 24 hours from time last known well should be treated with mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management if they meet the eligibility criteria of the DEFUSE-3* or DAWN** trials.

    • We do not recommend an upper NIHSS score limit for decision-making on mechanical thrombectomy. We recommend that patients with high stroke severity and large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke be treated with mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management, including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated. These recommendations also apply for patients in the 6–24 hour time window, provided that they meet the inclusion criteria for the DAWN or DEFUSE-3 studies.

    • We recommend that patients with low stroke severity (NIHSS score 0–5) and large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke within 24 hours from time last known well be included in randomized controlled trials comparing mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management versus best medical management alone.

    • In the 0–6 hour time window, we recommend mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management (including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated) over best medical management alone in patients with large vessel occlusion-related anterior circulation stroke without evidence of extensive infarct core (eg, ASPECTS ≥6 on non-contrast CT scan or infarct core volume ≤70 mL).

    • In the 6–24 hour time window, we recommend mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management (including intravenous thrombolysis whenever indicated) over best medical management alone in patients with large vessel occlusion-related anterior circulation stroke fulfilling the selection criteria of DEFUSE-3* or DAWN**, including estimated volume of infarct core.

    • We recommend that patients with anterior circulation stroke with extensive infarct core (eg, ASPECTS <6 on non-contrast CT scan or core volume >70 mL or >100 mL) be included in randomized controlled trials comparing mechanical thrombectomy plus best medical management with best medical management alone.

    • In adult patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke presenting from 0 to 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging is not necessary for patient selection.

    • In adult patients with anterior circulation large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke presenting beyond 6 hours from time last known well, advanced imaging selection is necessary.

    • In adult patients with large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke, we recommend treatment in a comprehensive stroke center.

    • For adults with large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke, we recommend that interventionalists should attempt a TICI grade 3 reperfusion, if achievable with reasonable safety.

    • There is no evidence that contact aspiration alone improves functional outcome compared with best medical management in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy.

    • There is no evidence that contact aspiration alone increases the rate of reperfusion over thrombectomy using a stent retriever.

    • Therefore, we suggest the use of a stent retriever over contact aspiration alone for mechanical thrombectomy in patients with acute ischemic stroke.

    • We cannot provide recommendations to use general anesthesia or conscious sedation in patients undergoing mechanical thrombectomy, due to low quality of evidence and conflicting results between three small single-center randomized clinical trials and the best available observational evidence. Therefore, we recommend the enrollment of patients in multicenter randomized controlled trials addressing this question.

    • We suggest keeping blood pressure below 180/105 mmHg during, and 24 hours after, mechanical thrombectomy. No specific blood pressure-lowering drug can be recommended.

    • During mechanical thrombectomy, systolic blood pressure drops should be avoided.

    • No recommendation can be provided regarding which treatment modality should be favored in patients with large vessel occlusion-related acute ischemic stroke and associated extracranial carotid artery stenosis or occlusion. We recommend the inclusion of such patients in dedicated randomized controlled trials.


    For more details click on the link: http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/neurintsurg-2018-014569

    blood pressuredevelopmentESMINT GuidelinesESOEuropean Society for Minimally Invasive Neurological TherapyEuropean Stroke OrganisationGrading of Recommendationsintravenous thrombolysislarge vessel occlusionmechanical thrombectomystrokesystolic blood pressure

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Hina Zahid
    Hina Zahid
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok