Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Editors Pick
    • Clinical trial...

    Clinical trial supports shorter regimen for multidrug-resistant TB: NEJM

    Written by Medha Baranwal Baranwal Published On 2019-03-22T20:28:58+05:30  |  Updated On 22 March 2019 8:28 PM IST
    Clinical trial supports shorter regimen for multidrug-resistant TB: NEJM

    A Clinical trial, STREAM Trial has released data that supports a shorter regimen for multidrug-resistant TB.


    The WHO guidelines of 2011 have recommended a long drug regimen of 20 months for the treatment of patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis (MDR-TB). However, a recent study published in the New England Journal of Medicine has found that a shorter regimen of 9 to 11 months works equally well as the longer regimen in MDR-TB patients.


    These are the results of the first stage of the phase 3 STREAM (Standard Treatment Regimen of Anti-Tuberculosis Drugs for Patients with MDR-TB). It showed that in patients with rifampin-resistant TB susceptible to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides, a shorter treatment regimen was noninferior to the standard regimen, producing a favorable outcome in 79% of participants while the longer treatment was found to be effective in 80% of the patients.


    The shorter regimen tested in the STREAM trial consisted of high-dose moxifloxacin, clofazimine, ethambutol, and pyrazinamide over 40 weeks, supplemented by kanamycin, isoniazid, and prothionamide during the first 16 weeks of treatment.


    Previous studies cohort studies in Bangladesh showed promising cure rates among patients with multidrug-resistant tuberculosis who received existing drugs in regimens shorter than that recommended by the WHO in 2011. Andrew Nunn, a senior scientist, and professor of epidemiology at University College London, and colleagues enrolled and screened 689 participants from Ethiopia, Mongolia, South Africa, and Vietnam from July 2012 through June 2015. Of these patients, 424 underwent randomization on a 2:1 basis, with 282 assigned to the short regimen and 142 to the long regimen. The modified intention-to-treat group included 389 patients, of whom 369 were included in the modified intention-to-treat efficacy analysis.


    The primary efficacy outcome was a favorable status at 132 weeks, defined by cultures negative for Mycobacterium tuberculosis at 132 weeks and at a previous occasion, with no intervening positive culture or previous unfavorable outcome. The noninferiority margin was 10 percentage points.


    Key Findings:




    • Favorable status was attained by 78.8% of patients (193 of 245) in the short-regimen group and 79.8% of patients (99 of 124) in the long-regimen group.

    • With adjustment for HIV status, the difference was 1 percentage point.

    • The noninferiority results were consistent in the per-protocol population, with 81.9% of patients (186 of 227) in the short-regimen group achieving favorable status compared with 80.7% of patients (63 of 87) in the long-regimen group.

    • The noninferiority results were consistent in the per-protocol population, with 81.9% of patients (186 of 227) in the short-regimen group achieving favorable status compared with 80.7% of patients (63 of 87) in the long-regimen group.

    • The comparison of safety outcomes found that an adverse event of grade 3 or higher occurred in 48.2% of patients (136 of 282) treated with the short regimen and 45.4% of patients (64 of 141) on the long regimen.

    • Electrocardiogram readings showed that more patients in the short-regimen arm experienced prolongation of the QT interval (11% vs. 6.4% in the long-regimen arm), a syndrome that causes irregular heart rhythms. As a result, some of those patients received medication adjustments.

    • The comparison of safety outcomes found that an adverse event of grade 3 or higher occurred in 48.2% of patients (136 of 282) treated with the short regimen and 45.4% of patients (64 of 141) on the long regimen.

    • In addition, electrocardiogram readings showed that more patients in the short-regimen arm experienced prolongation of the QT interval (11% vs. 6.4% in the long-regimen arm), a syndrome that causes irregular heart rhythms. As a result, some of those patients received medication adjustments.

    • There were also more deaths among short-regimen patients, liver and ear disorders, and more acquired resistance to fluoroquinolones and aminoglycosides compared with patients on the long regimen, although the differences were not considered statistically significant.


    The results hold significance ad for some MDR-TB patients, the treatment now could be significantly cheaper and shorter. The length and costs of the standard MDR-TB treatment, along with the side effects associated with some of the second-line antibiotics, are among the reasons that the treatment success rate for MDR-TB is only 54%.


    Shorter regimens could help improve the poor success rate for MDR-TB treatment, which is significantly lower than the 82% success rate for patients with susceptible TB and is hindering global efforts to tackle the disease.


    A second stage of the STREAM trial is currently evaluating whether a fully oral version of the short regimen—which would avoid the toxic effects associated with kanamycin—is as effective as the longer regimen.


    For further reference log on to 10.1056/NEJMoa1811867

    coursedurationfluoroquinolonesMDRMDR-TBMDR-TB treatmentmultidrug resistancemultidrug resistant TBmultidrug resistant tuberculosisNEJMNew England Journal of Medicineregimenrifampin resistant TBshortshorterSTREAM TrialTBTB drugsTB medicinesTB treatmenttreatmentTuberculosis
    Source : With inputs from New England Journal of Medicine�

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok