Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Latest News
    • Caution: Use of...

    Caution: Use of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media can be life-threatening

    Written by Medha Baranwal Baranwal Published On 2018-08-20T19:25:03+05:30  |  Updated On 20 Aug 2018 7:25 PM IST
    Caution: Use of iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media can be life-threatening


    Allergic immediate hypersensitivity (IH) account for <10% of cutaneous reactions, and >50% of life-threatening ones, finds a study of the allergic IH frequency among iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media (ICM or GBCM). The frequency and severity of IH reactions triggered by GBCM and ICM were comparable. Cross-reactivity was frequent, especially for GBCM.


    Olivier Clement, Assistance Publique Hôpital Européen Georges Pompidou, France, and colleagues report findings of the study in the journal EClinicalMedicine. They propose considering the skin testing with pure contrast agent, as it is more sensitive than the usual 1:10 dilution criteria.


    Among adverse events to contrast media (CM), IH reactions raise the highest level of concern for radiologists and patients, since they may lead to severe anaphylactic shock within minutes after injection of CM, sometimes leading to death.



    Iodinated and gadolinium-based contrast media (ICM; GBCM) induce IH reactions. Differentiating allergic from non-allergic IH is crucial; allergy contraindicates the culprit agent for life.




    For the study, the researchers recorded clinical symptoms, plasma histamine and tryptase concentrations and skin tests of the patients recruited in 31 hospitals between 2005 and 2009. Allergic IH was diagnosed by intradermal tests (IDT) with the culprit CM diluted 1:10, “potentially allergic” IH by positive IDT with pure CM, and non-allergic IH by negative IDT.


    Also Read: Gadolinium-based contrast agents in Kidney Disease: New CAR Guideline


    "Our study has important consequences for daily radiological practice: Contrary to current opinion, GBCM are not safer than ICM regarding IH reactions, and patients should be managed identically. Patients experiencing their first injection of CM are usually considered as not at risk for allergic IH. However, the present data and data from others indicate that they may be sensitized to CM via some molecule in their environment and should thus be considered as potential reactors," write the authors.




    Key Findings:

    • Among 245 skin-tested patients (ICM = 209; GBCM = 36), allergic IH to ICM was identified in 41 (19.6%) and to GBCM in 10 (27.8%).

    • Skin cross-reactivity was observed in 11 patients with ICM (26.8%) and 5 with GBCM (50%).

    • Allergy frequency increased with clinical severity and histamine and tryptase concentrations.

    • Cardiovascular signs were strongly associated with allergy.

    • Non-allergic IH was observed in 152 patients (62%) (ICM:134; GBCM:18).

    • Severity grade was lower and reaction delay longer (11.6 vs 5.6 min).

    • Potentially allergic IH was diagnosed in 42 patients (17.1%) (ICM:34; GBCM:8).

    • The delay, severity grade, and mediator release were intermediate between the two other groups.


    "A safer approach is to elucidate the mechanism of the reaction through blood and skin testing, and to identify the culprit and cross-reactive agents, thus allowing selection of a safe CM for future opacifications of allergic patients," concluded the authors.




    For more information follow the link: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eclinm.2018.07.002





    contrastEClinicalMedicinegadoliniumhypersensitivityintradermalIodinatedmedianon allergicOlivier Clementradiologistsradiologyreactionstests
    Source : With inputs from EClinicalMedicine

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
    Medha Baranwal Baranwal
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok