Vitamin D does not prevent fractures in adults : Lancet

In the largest Study to date researchers have found that Vitamin D supplementation does not prevent fractures or falls, or improve bone mineral density in adults. The study also found no differences in the effects of higher versus lower doses of vitamin D.

The findings of the study have been published in The Lancet Diabetes & Endocrinology journal.

Vitamin D supplements are usually recommended for older people to treat or prevent osteoporosis, with some early evidence suggesting benefits for bone health. But recent large-scale reviews have reported no effect of vitamin D supplementation on bone mineral density, falls or fractures.

In the present study, the data from 81 randomised controlled trials were pooled. The majority of the trials studied vitamin D alone and were of one year or less. Most included women aged over the age of 65 (77% of trials) who lived in the community and who received daily doses of more than 800 IU per day (68% of trials).

More than half of the trials were done in populations with baseline concentrations of 25-hydroxyvitamin D (25OHD [2]) of less than 50 nmol/L (a cut-off often considered to indicate low vitamin D levels), but only 6% were done in populations with vitamin D deficiency (a baseline 25OHD of less than 25 nmol/L). The majority of trials (91%) reported achieving 25OHD concentrations of 50 nmol/L or more, and about half reported achieving 25OHD concentrations of 75 nmol/L or more.

It was found that there was no clinically meaningful effect of vitamin D supplementation on total fracture, hip fracture, or falls. It was reliably evident that vitamin D does not reduce total fractures, hip fractures, or falls by 15%—a clinically meaningful threshold. Even when lower thresholds were assessed, there was still reliable evidence that vitamin D does not reduce falls by 7.5% and total fractures by 5%.

In secondary analyses looking at bone density, there were small differences for lumbar spine, femoral neck, and for total body, but none of these were clinically relevant. In addition, the authors conducted more than 60 subgroup analyses to verify their finding

The authors conclude that there is therefore little justification to use vitamin D supplements to maintain or improve musculoskeletal health, except for the prevention of rare conditions such as rickets and osteomalacia in high risk groups, which can occur due to vitamin D deficiency after a prolonged lack of exposure to sunshine.

The authors say that clinical guidelines that continue to recommend vitamin D supplementation for bone health should be changed to reflect the best available evidence.

“Since the last major review of the evidence in 2014, more than 30 randomised controlled trials on vitamin D and bone health have been published, nearly doubling the evidence base available. Our meta-analysis finds that vitamin D does not prevent fractures, falls or improve bone mineral density, whether at a high or low dose. Clinical guidelines should be changed to reflect these findings. On the strength of existing evidence, we believe there is little justification for more trials of vitamin D supplements looking at musculoskeletal outcomes,” says lead author Dr Mark J Bolland, University of Auckland, New Zealand.

The authors note that the data were collected differently for falls in different trials, which might affect the study findings. While the authors rated all trials for risk of bias, there were methodological limitations in some of the trials. Additionally, they note that smaller trials of shorter duration tended to find stronger effects of vitamin D compared to larger trials of longer duration.

Because of the small number of trials with baseline 25OHD below 25 nmol/L (total of 831 participants), more research might be needed into the effect of vitamin D supplementation at these levels.

The study will bust myths prevalent in Society and even among doctors that vitamin D is a cure-all and panacea for all diseases.