Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury

Published On 2017-05-28 05:20 GMT   |   Update On 2017-05-28 05:20 GMT

U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, Brain Trauma Foundation has issued the Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, 4th edition. Following are the major recommendations :




Evidence Synthesis and Recommendations, Part I: Treatments


Decompressive Craniectomy*

Level I




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I recommendation for this topic.


Level II A




  • Bifrontal decompressive craniectomy (DC) is not recommended to improve outcomes as measured by the Glasgow Outcome Scale–Extended (GOS-E) score at 6 months post-injury in severe traumatic brain injury (TBI) patients with diffuse injury (without mass lesions), and with intracranial pressure (ICP) elevation to values >20 mm Hg for more than 15 minutes within a 1-hour period that are refractory to first-tier therapies. However, this procedure has been demonstrated to reduce ICP and to minimize days in the intensive care unit (ICU).

  • A large frontotemporoparietal DC (not less than 12 x 15 cm or 15 cm diameter) is recommended over a small frontotemporoparietal DC for reduced mortality and improved neurologic outcomes in patients with severe TBI.


Prophylactic Hypothermia


Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II A recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Early (within 2.5 hours), short-term (48 hours post-injury) prophylactic hypothermia is not recommended to improve outcomes in patients with diffuse injury.


Hyperosmolar Therapy


Level I, II, and III




  • Although hyperosmolar therapy may lower intracranial pressure, there was insufficient evidence about effects on clinical outcomes to support a specific recommendation, or to support use of any specific hyperosmolar agent, for patients with severe traumatic brain injury.


Cerebrospinal Fluid Drainage


Level I and II




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II recommendation for this topic.


Level III




  • An external ventricular drainage (EVD) system zeroed at the midbrain with continuous drainage of cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) may be considered to lower ICP burden more effectively than intermittent use.

  • Use of CSF drainage to lower ICP in patients with an initial Glasgow Coma Scale (GCS) <6 during the first 12 hours after injury may be considered.


Ventilation Therapies


Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II A recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Prolonged prophylactic hyperventilation with partial pressure of carbon dioxide in arterial blood (PaCO2) of 25 mm Hg or less is not recommended.


Anesthetics, Analgesics, and Sedatives


Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or Level IIA recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Administration of barbiturates to induce burst suppression measured by electroencephalogram (EEG) as prophylaxis against the development of intracranial hypertension is not recommended.

  • High-dose barbiturate administration is recommended to control elevated ICP refractory to maximum standard medical and surgical treatment. Hemodynamic stability is essential before and during barbiturate therapy.

  • Although propofol is recommended for the control of ICP, it is not recommended for improvement in mortality or 6-month outcomes. Caution is required as high-dose propofol can produce significant morbidity (U.S. Food and Drug Administration, 2008; Kang, 2002).


Steroids


Level I




  • The use of steroids is not recommended for improving outcome or reducing ICP. In patients with severe TBI, high-dose methylprednisolone was associated with increased mortality and is contraindicated.


Nutrition


Level I




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I recommendation for this topic.


Level II A




  • Feeding patients to attain basal caloric replacement at least by the fifth day and, at most, by the seventh day post-injury is recommended to decrease mortality.


Level II B




  • Transgastric jejunal feeding is recommended to reduce the incidence of ventilator-associated pneumonia.


Infection Prophylaxis


Level I




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I recommendation for this topic.


Level II A




  • Early tracheostomy is recommended to reduce mechanical ventilation days when the overall benefit is felt to outweigh the complications associated with such a procedure. However, there is no evidence that early tracheostomy reduces mortality or the rate of nosocomial pneumonia.

  • The use of povidone-iodine (PI) oral care is not recommended to reduce ventilator-associated pneumonia and may cause an increased risk of acute respiratory distress syndrome.


Level III




  • Antimicrobial-impregnated catheters may be considered to prevent catheter-related infections during EVD.


Deep Vein Thrombosis Prophylaxis


Level I and II




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II recommendation for treatment of deep vein thrombosis (DVT) in severe TBI patients.


Level III




  • Low molecular weight heparin (LMWH) or low-dose unfractionated heparin may be used in combination with mechanical prophylaxis. However, there is an increased risk for expansion of intracranial hemorrhage.


In addition to compression stockings, pharmacologic prophylaxis may be considered if the brain injury is stable and the benefit is considered to outweigh the risk of increased intracranial hemorrhage. There is insufficient evidence to support recommendations regarding the preferred agent, dose, or timing of pharmacologic prophylaxis for deep vein thrombosis.


Seizure Prophylaxis


Level I




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I recommendation for this topic.


Level II A




  • Prophylactic use of phenytoin or valproate is not recommended for preventing late post-traumatic seizures (PTS).



  • Phenytoin is recommended to decrease the incidence of early PTS (within 7 days of injury), when the overall benefit is felt to outweigh the complications associated with such treatment. However, early PTS have not been associated with worse outcomes.


At the present time there is insufficient evidence to recommend levetiracetam over phenytoin regarding efficacy in preventing early post-traumatic seizures and toxicity.


Evidence Synthesis and Recommendations, Part II: Monitoring


Intracranial Pressure Monitoring

Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II A recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Management of severe TBI patients using information from ICP monitoring is recommended to reduce in-hospital and 2-week post-injury mortality.


Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Monitoring


Level I




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Management of severe TBI patients using guidelines-based recommendations for cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) monitoring is recommended to decrease 2-week mortality.


Advanced Cerebral Monitoring


Level I and II




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II recommendation for this topic.


(Although patients with desaturations identified with advanced cerebral monitoring have poorer outcomes, Level II evidence showed no improvement in outcomes for monitored patients.)


Level III




  • Jugular bulb monitoring of arteriovenous oxygen content difference (AVDO2), as a source of information for management decisions, may be considered to reduce mortality and improve outcomes at 3 and 6 months post-injury.


Evidence Synthesis and Recommendations, Part III: Thresholds


Blood Pressure Thresholds


Level I and II




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II recommendation for this topic.


Level III




  • Maintaining systolic blood pressure (SBP) at ≥100 mm Hg for patients 50 to 69 years old or at ≥110 mm Hg or above for patients 15 to 49 or over 70 years old may be considered to decrease mortality and improve outcomes.


Intracranial Pressure Thresholds*


Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II A recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • Treating ICP above 22 mm Hg is recommended because values above this level are associated with increased mortality.


Level III




  • A combination of ICP values and clinical and brain computed tomography (CT) findings may be used to make management decisions.


Cerebral Perfusion Pressure Thresholds


Level I and II A




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II A recommendation for this topic.


Level II B




  • The recommended target cerebral perfusion pressure (CPP) value for survival and favorable outcomes is between 60 and 70 mm Hg. Whether 60 or 70 mm Hg is the minimum optimal CPP threshold is unclear and may depend upon the patient's autoregulatory status.


Level III




  • Avoiding aggressive attempts to maintain CPP above 70 mm Hg with fluids and pressors may be considered because of the risk of adult respiratory failure.


Advanced Cerebral Monitoring Thresholds


Level I and II




  • There was insufficient evidence to support a Level I or II recommendation for this topic.


Level III




  • Jugular venous saturation of <50% may be a threshold to avoid in order to reduce mortality and improve outcomes.


Read the full guideline click on the link : Carney N, Totten AM, O'Reilly C, Ullman JS, Hawryluk GW, Bell MJ, Bratton SL, Chesnut R, Harris OA, Kissoon N, Rubiano AM, Shutter L, Tasker RC, Vavilala MS, Wilberger J, Wright DW, Ghajar J. Guidelines for the management of severe traumatic brain injury, 4th edition. Campbell (CA): Brain Trauma Foundation; 2016 Sep. 244 p. [341 references]


Tags:    

Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

Our comments section is governed by our Comments Policy . By posting comments at Medical Dialogues you automatically agree with our Comments Policy , Terms And Conditions and Privacy Policy .

Similar News

NICE Guidelines on Latent TB