Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • facebook
    • twitter
    Login Register
    • Medical Dialogues
    • Education Dialogues
    • Business Dialogues
    • Medical Jobs
    • Medical Matrimony
    • MD Brand Connect
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    • Editorial
    • News
        • Anesthesiology
        • Cancer
        • Cardiac Sciences
        • Critical Care
        • Dentistry
        • Dermatology
        • Diabetes and Endo
        • Diagnostics
        • ENT
        • Featured Research
        • Gastroenterology
        • Geriatrics
        • Medicine
        • Nephrology
        • Neurosciences
        • Nursing
        • Obs and Gynae
        • Ophthalmology
        • Orthopaedics
        • Paediatrics
        • Parmedics
        • Pharmacy
        • Psychiatry
        • Pulmonology
        • Radiology
        • Surgery
        • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
        • Anesthesiology Guidelines
        • Cancer Guidelines
        • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
        • Critical Care Guidelines
        • Dentistry Guidelines
        • Dermatology Guidelines
        • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
        • Diagnostics Guidelines
        • ENT Guidelines
        • Featured Practice Guidelines
        • Gastroenterology Guidelines
        • Geriatrics Guidelines
        • Medicine Guidelines
        • Nephrology Guidelines
        • Neurosciences Guidelines
        • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
        • Ophthalmology Guidelines
        • Orthopaedics Guidelines
        • Paediatrics Guidelines
        • Psychiatry Guidelines
        • Pulmonology Guidelines
        • Radiology Guidelines
        • Surgery Guidelines
        • Urology Guidelines
    LoginRegister
    Speciality Medical Dialogues
    LoginRegister
    • Home
    • Editorial
    • News
      • Anesthesiology
      • Cancer
      • Cardiac Sciences
      • Critical Care
      • Dentistry
      • Dermatology
      • Diabetes and Endo
      • Diagnostics
      • ENT
      • Featured Research
      • Gastroenterology
      • Geriatrics
      • Medicine
      • Nephrology
      • Neurosciences
      • Nursing
      • Obs and Gynae
      • Ophthalmology
      • Orthopaedics
      • Paediatrics
      • Parmedics
      • Pharmacy
      • Psychiatry
      • Pulmonology
      • Radiology
      • Surgery
      • Urology
    • Practice Guidelines
      • Anesthesiology Guidelines
      • Cancer Guidelines
      • Cardiac Sciences Guidelines
      • Critical Care Guidelines
      • Dentistry Guidelines
      • Dermatology Guidelines
      • Diabetes and Endo Guidelines
      • Diagnostics Guidelines
      • ENT Guidelines
      • Featured Practice Guidelines
      • Gastroenterology Guidelines
      • Geriatrics Guidelines
      • Medicine Guidelines
      • Nephrology Guidelines
      • Neurosciences Guidelines
      • Obs and Gynae Guidelines
      • Ophthalmology Guidelines
      • Orthopaedics Guidelines
      • Paediatrics Guidelines
      • Psychiatry Guidelines
      • Pulmonology Guidelines
      • Radiology Guidelines
      • Surgery Guidelines
      • Urology Guidelines
    • Home
    • Practice Guidelines
    • Featured Practice Guidelines
    • ACR Guidelines for...

    ACR Guidelines for Ultrasound examination in cases of Multiple Gestations

    Written by Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli Published On 2018-08-09T19:03:36+05:30  |  Updated On 16 Aug 2021 4:26 PM IST

    American College of Radiology has released ACR Appropriateness Criteria for US examinations in women with multiple pregnancies which have been published in The Journal of the American College of Radiology. The American College of Radiology Appropriateness Criteria are evidence-based guidelines for specific clinical conditions that are reviewed annually by a multidisciplinary expert panel. Over the past 4 decades, the increased use of assisted reproductive techniques in the United States has been associated with a substantial rise in the rate of multiple births. Women with twin or higher-order pregnancies will typically have many more US examinations than women with a singleton pregnancy.


    The aim of each US varies with gestational age, and there is no accepted standard for the number of scans. However, the majority of women will have, as a minimum, a first-trimester scan, a 12-week nuchal translucency (NT) scan, a fetal anatomy scan at 18 to 22 weeks, and one or more scans in the third trimester to evaluate growth.The recommendations are based on analysis of the current medical evidence literature and the application of the RAND/UCLA appropriateness method and expert panel consensus.



    Major Recommendations




    • Transabdominal and transvaginal US are recommended in the first trimester when a twin pregnancy is known or suspected. Chorionicity and amnionicity are most accurately evaluated in the first trimester.

    • The transabdominal US is recommended for dichorionic twins when evaluating fetal anatomy. Transvaginal US of the cervix may help triage patients into higher risk group for preterm delivery. Fetal echocardiography may be useful in some instances, such as when twins are conceived through in vitro fertilization.

    • The transabdominal US is performed in monochorionic twins for fetal anatomy and to screen for fetal anomalies and TTTS. Fetal echocardiography helps screen for structural congenital cardiac anomalies. Transvaginal US of the cervix may help triage patients into higher risk group for preterm delivery. Duplex Doppler velocimetry is recommended in cases of TTTS, velamentous cord insertion, and sIUGR.

    • The transabdominal US is recommended for growth and antepartum surveillance for dichorionic twins with duplex Doppler velocimetry used in cases of growth discrepancy.

    • The transabdominal US is recommended for growth and antepartum surveillance for monochorionic twins. Duplex Doppler velocimetry and BPP monitoring are helpful in cases of IUGR, TTTS, TAPS, TRAP sequence, and IUFD. Fetal echocardiography should be performed to look for congenital cardiac disease and monitor cardiac function.

    • Transabdominal US, duplex Doppler velocimetry, and BPP monitoring are recommended for follow-up of known twin discrepancy. Fetal echocardiography is helpful in monochorionic-monoamniotic twins.


    Abbreviations

    • IV, intravenous

    • TTTS, twin-to-twin transfusion syndrome

    • US, ultrasound


    Potential adverse health effects associated with radiation exposure are an important factor to consider when selecting the appropriate imaging procedure. Because there is a wide range of radiation exposures associated with different diagnostic procedures, a relative radiation level (RRL) indication has been included for each imaging examination.


    Relative Radiation Level Designations












































    Relative Radiation Level*Adult Effective Dose Estimate RangePediatric Effective Dose Estimate Range
    O0 mSv0 mSv
    <0.1 mSv<0.03 mSv
    0.1-1 mSv0.03-0.3 mSv
    1-10 mSv0.3-3 mSv
    10-30 mSv3-10 mSv
    30-100 mSv10-30 mSv
    *RRL assignments for some of the examinations cannot be made, because the actual patient doses in these procedures vary as a function of a number of factors (e.g., region of the body exposed to ionizing radiation, the imaging guidance that is used). The RRLs for these examinations are designated as "Varies."





    ACR Appropriateness Criteria®

    Multiple Gestations

    Variant 1: Known or suspected multiple gestations. Monochorionic or dichorionic. First trimester US.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryUsually Not AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually Not AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually Not AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalUsually Not AppropriateO


    Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

    Variant 2: Multiple gestations. Dichorionic. Second trimester US. Anatomy scan.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalUsually AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalMay Be AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryUsually Not AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually Not AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually Not AppropriateO


    Variant 3: Multiple gestations. Monochorionic. Second trimester US. Anatomy scan.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalUsually AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalUsually AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryUsually AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually Not AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO


    Note: Abbreviations used in the tables are listed at the end of the "Major Recommendations" field.

    Variant 4: Multiple gestations. Dichorionic. Growth and antepartum surveillance.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalMay Be AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryMay Be AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalUsually Not AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually Not AppropriateO


    Variant 5: Multiple gestations. Monochorionic. Growth and antepartum surveillance.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryUsually AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalMay Be AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalMay Be AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO


    Variant 6: Multiple gestations. Known twin discordance. Monochorionic or dichorionic.














































    ProcedureAppropriateness CategoryRelative Radiation Level
    US pregnant uterus transabdominalUsually AppropriateO
    US duplex Doppler velocimetryUsually AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus biophysical profileUsually AppropriateO
    US assessment for TTTSUsually AppropriateO
    US cervix transvaginalMay Be AppropriateO
    US echocardiography fetalMay Be AppropriateO
    US pregnant uterus transvaginalUsually Not AppropriateO


    Benefits/Harms of Implementing the Guideline Recommendations




    Potential Benefits



    • For monochorionic-monoamniotic twins, recent studies have shown encouraging survival rates of greater than 90% with early diagnosis, serial ultrasound (US), and antenatal surveillance.

    • Although there is no proven benefit of umbilical artery Doppler evaluation in uncomplicated twins, it has been shown to be helpful when growth delay is suspected and in monochorionic twins.

    • Surveillance with a nonstress test or biophysical profile (BPP) for pregnancies complicated by abnormal fluid volumes, pregnancy-induced hypertension, fetal anomalies, growth abnormalities, monoamnionicity, or other standard obstetric indications is as reliable in multiple gestations as in singleton gestations.

    • The antenatal knowledge of adverse outcome predictors such as velamentous cord insertion of vasa previa may be useful in risk stratification and management of twin pregnancies.

    • A baseline cervical length assessment performed using the transvaginal US will help determine whether patients should be triaged into a higher risk group for preterm delivery.



    Potential Harms


    Caution is warranted in establishing the viability of a twin during early pregnancy because the demise of one of the twins is relatively common, resulting in the so-called "vanishing twin."


    For Further reference log on to :

    PMID: 29101986 DOI: 10.1016/j.jacr.2017.08.051




    Dichorionic; MonochorionicMultiple gestation(s)twinsUltrasound
    Source : With inputs from American College of Radiology

    Disclaimer: This site is primarily intended for healthcare professionals. Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription. Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. © 2020 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

    Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli
    Dr. Kamal Kant Kohli Kohli
      Show Full Article
      Next Story
      Similar Posts
      NO DATA FOUND

      • Email: info@medicaldialogues.in
      • Phone: 011 - 4372 0751

      Website Last Updated On : 12 Oct 2022 7:06 AM GMT
      Company
      • About Us
      • Contact Us
      • Our Team
      • Reach our Editor
      • Feedback
      • Submit Article
      Ads & Legal
      • Advertise
      • Advertise Policy
      • Terms and Conditions
      • Privacy Policy
      • Editorial Policy
      • Comments Policy
      • Disclamier
      Medical Dialogues is health news portal designed to update medical and healthcare professionals but does not limit/block other interested parties from accessing our general health content. The health content on Medical Dialogues and its subdomains is created and/or edited by our expert team, that includes doctors, healthcare researchers and scientific writers, who review all medical information to keep them in line with the latest evidence-based medical information and accepted health guidelines by established medical organisations of the world.

      Any content/information on this website does not replace the advice of medical and/or health professionals and should not be construed as medical/diagnostic advice/endorsement or prescription.Use of this site is subject to our terms of use, privacy policy, advertisement policy. You can check out disclaimers here. © 2025 Minerva Medical Treatment Pvt Ltd

      © 2025 - Medical Dialogues. All Rights Reserved.
      Powered By: Hocalwire
      X
      We use cookies for analytics, advertising and to improve our site. You agree to our use of cookies by continuing to use our site. To know more, see our Cookie Policy and Cookie Settings.Ok